Pages

A universe of beauty, mystery and wonder

A universe of beauty, mystery and wonder
©http://ottersandsciencenews.blogspot.ca/ UNAUTHORIZED USE AND/OR DUPLICATION OF THIS BLOG'S MATERIAL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. EXCERPTS AND LINKS MAY BE USED, PROVIDED THAT FULL AND CLEAR CREDIT IS GIVEN TO OTTERS AND SCIENCE NEWS BLOGSPOT WITH APPROPRIATE AND SPECIFIC DIRECTION TO THE ORIGINAL CONTENT. --- THE FACTS AND OPINIONS POSTED ON THIS BLOG ARE HERE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSE AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS AND OPINIONS OF THIS BLOG'S ADMINISTRATOR.

Sunday, July 24, 2016

IS THERE A CONNECTION BETWEEN ISLAM AND MENTAL ILLNESS? - Early indoctrination advocating supremacy, violent conquest, gruesome punishments, as well as the forced suppression of normal sexuality and rational secular thinking produce inheritable detrimental effects on the genome, according to the science of EPIGENETICS - Widespread child abuse, inbreeding and backwardness aggravate the situation even further

©http://ottersandsciencenews.blogspot.ca/. Unauthorized duplication of this blog's material is prohibited.   Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full credit and link is given to Otters and Science News Blogspot.  Link to this post: http://ottersandsciencenews.blogspot.ca/2016/07/is-there-connection-between-islam-and.html - Thank you for visiting my blog.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Syrian refugee kills woman and injures others with machete in Reutlingen Germany

BREAKING NEWS:  DAILY MAIL  Reutlingen, Germany -  Another case of a "deranged" Muslim wreaking havoc.  Syrian refugee, 21, hacks PREGNANT woman to death with a MACHETE and injures two others before driver runs him over.
 
 
 
This is not normal.  This is pathological.
 (Read details about this genocide at the bottom of this page.)

Western authorities and media - desperate to maintain the myth that Islam is a religion of peace -  have found a way to deflect its connection with recurrent acts of carnage by ascribing "mental illness" to the perpetrators.
 
Liberals are right, for once.  But not in the way they mean it.  These acts are not aberrations of Islam but the result of it.  Obviously not every Muslim always acts in a pathological way, but the damage is there, in their genome, and it even shows in second and subsequent generations of western-raised Muslims, as the science of epigenetics demonstrates.
 
It's not poverty.  Liberals used to blame poverty and lack of opportunities for Muslim rage.  That argument was debunked by the frequent instances of wealthy and western-educated Muslims joining ISIS or committing terror acts in the West and abroad.
 
It's not anger against Israel.  It's easy to blame the Jews, but Muslims have been killing Jews and engaging in gruesome violence since the inception of Islam in the 7th century.  
 
Were Israel and all the Jews disappear, Islam could continue to engage in conquest and extreme violence because that is the essence of this ideology:  to dominate the word, to convert the Infidel or to kill them, and to severely punish transgressors.
 
It's not just ISIS.  ISIS has become a convenient monster on which to lay blame for all excesses of Muslim extremism.  This blame implies that carnage is not being perpetrated by "true Muslims" but by those who have "hijacked" their peaceful religion.  Nothing could be further from the truth. 
 
First, ISIS follows the Koran and Hadith to the letter.  They are the true Muslims.  Those who ignore the Koran's violent edicts are merely semi-observant Muslims.
 
Second, the history of Islam is one of brutal conquest and genocide that mirrors ISIS horrors. 
 
Conservative statistics demonstrate that in fourteen centuries of Islam at least 270 million non-Muslims have been slaughtered in a still ongoing campaign of violence.  The worst genocides were those against Africans and Hindus.  Millions of Africans died as a result of the Arab slave trade. 
 
Add to that millions of Muslims who have died at the hands of other Muslims. 
 
It's not Islamism or "radical Islam".  Several western terrorists had lived rather secular lives, openly engaging in many activities forbidden by Islam.   Experts wonder at how such hedonistic and westernized fellows could decide to slaughter a bunch of innocent Infidels.   So those experts blame mental illness, instead of Islam. 
 
It's not just the maladjusted.  The damage is so pervasive that it affects relationships with their loved ones.  It's not uncommon for peaceful and law-abiding Muslim citizens in Western countries to murder their wives or daughters in "honor killings".   And it's not a patriarchal issue alone.  Even women sometimes murder their own daughters when they are perceived to have become too westernized.  
 
Jeremy Hunt wants Britain to become the first country in the world to routinely test children's entire DNA at birth to identify diseases It's genetic and cultural.  The science of epigenetics has found that experiences, such as traumas, lifestyle, ways of thinking and making a living, and the physical environment itself - all produce changes in the way genes express themselves.  These genetic changes are inheritable.
 
In such an  oppressive society Muslim children can be physically, and sometimes sexually, abused. 

They are indoctrinated from an early age not only on the spiritual aspects of Islam, but on decrees mandating gruesome punishments for those who break the law, offend Islam, and for those who refuse to convert to Islam.  This culture is passed on from parents to children, and it becomes ingrained. 
 
That mindset has already been molded by genetic and epigenetic changes.  Methods inculcating western values or even a more aggressive cult deprogramming,  won't have any lasting effect on them.   

Generations of Muslims raised during fourteen centuries of Islam have a genetic imprint that can't be erased by relocating them to the West and providing them with secular education and values.
 
In fact, the West is aggravating their situation because the clash of cultures intensifies Muslims' own conflicts between what they want in terms of sex and freedom, and their ingrained Islamic values.
 
That is why some secular men from Muslim backgrounds resort to martyrdom as the ultimate solution to their inner conflicts, and to cleanse their sins.  
 
What science has to say:
 
  • Scientific study:  Brains are permanently altered by habits.  Habits alter the brain's circuitry, leading to cerebral changes that could last a lifetime. 
  • The science of epigenetics has found that human experiences (traumas, habits, the effects of the physical and cultural environment) produce changes in how genes express themselves, and that these changes are durable and inheritable. 
  • Recent studies have discovered the particular genes determining intelligence, thus discrediting previous assumptions that IQ had nothing to do with race or inheritance.   
  • If intelligence, as well as physical characteristics, are passed on from parents to offspring, so are personal characteristics that up to now were ascribed to the cultural environment, and thus subject to modification.  
  • Some characteristics are so genetically entrenched that they can override temporary layers of cultural adjustment. 
  • In the specific case of Muslim refugees, you can't change their genes by the simple act of transplanting them from a 7th century culture to the West, and providing them with a modern education and opportunities for the pursuit of happiness.   
  • This partly explain the attraction that Islam fundamentalism exercises on western university-educated Muslims.  Many have even joined ISIS.  These people are just being who they are at their very genetic core. 
  • So here we have two factors molding the Muslim mind:  (1) their genetic and epigenetic inheritances, and (2)  their upbringing.  Both will reinforce a mold that will continue to be passed on in even greater strength to the next generation.    
  • This is how breeds of animals with certain characteristics are created:  by increasingly refining and reinforcing their desired qualities.  Without  intending to offend anyone, we must admit that since humans are biologically animals, so they too are subject to issues of breeding. 
  • Inbreeding in Muslim culture is another problem.  In Pakistan, for example, over 70% of marriages are between cousins.  This has resulted in a myriad of physical and mental deficiencies.  
  • Then there is the detrimental effects of Muslim culture on children's minds.  Before the computer age little boys in Saudi Arabia would go with their dads to the public square to watch beheadings.  That's how the death penalty is legally carried out in Islam.    
  • These days little boys and girls can watch beheadings and worse on their own computers.   A non-Muslim boy knows that this is a brutal act.  But a Muslim boy believes that this is the way Allah wants sinners to be punished, and he sees his elders sanctioning such actions.  A big difference. 
  • So when little Mohammed grows up and moves to France, or Germany, or Sweden, he truly believes that dying while killing the Infidel will turn him into a martyr to be rewarded by Allah with a harem of 72  heavenly virgins.   That's the double effect of Muslim indoctrination and the holy sanctioning of brutality.   
  • Also notice how this ideology uses sexual repression to lure men to die in battle or inflicting carnage.  That's one way of ending their sexual frustration.  Seventy-two virgins will be waiting for them.  Christianity envisions heaven as a spiritual place next to God.  Muslims envision heaven as a never-ending sexual orgy.  No wonder these two cultures can never coexist.

On this page you will find articles and excerpts that explore the subjects of epigenetics, Muslim inbreeding, and Muslim ideology.  These factors must be seen as interconnecting in order to explain the perplexing rage and violence pervading the Muslim world. 
 
Some of those articles have been written by the reputable European psychologist, Dr. Nicolai Sennels, who has been treating Muslims for many years. 

Scientific reports (mostly by Dr. Nicolai Sennels):  

-  How Islam creates sociopaths. 
_  Muslims raised to be insecure and intolerant.
How widespread Muslim inbreeding affects intelligence and health in the population. 
-  How Islamic doctrine promotes a culture of rape and violence
 

CONTINUE READING
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 
The book A Troublesome Inheritance by Nicholas Wade raised much controversy when it presented the science behind inheritable characteristics among ethnic and racial groups in the world. 
 
From the book: 
Because populations stayed in place for thousands of years, substantially isolated from one another, evolution has proceeded independently on each continent, giving rise to the various races of humankind.
The book explores the possibility that recent human evolution has included changes in social behaviour, and hence in the nature of human societies.   
(The author) points to findings that middle class social traits - thrift, literacy, nonviolence - have been slowly but surely inculcated genetically within agrarian populations, a process that culminated in the Industrial Revolution and the emergence of modern societies. 
The notable achievements of Jewish communities are explored as another possible example of human evolution within the historical period. 
Rejecting unequivocally the notion of racial superiority, A Troublesome Inheritance argues that the evolution of the human races holds information critical to the understanding of human societies and history, and that the public interest is best served by pursuing the scientific truth without fear.  
Read more about this book and its subject:
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

WHAT IS EPIGENETICS?

  • Epigenetics is the study of heritable changes in gene expression that does not involve changes to the underlying DNA sequence.
  • Epigenetic change is a regular and natural occurrence, but can also be influenced by factors including age, the environment, and lifestyle.
  • Epigenetic modifications can manifest as the manner in which cells differentiate to end up as skin cells, liver cells, brain cells, etc.
  • New and ongoing research is continuously uncovering the role of epigenetics in a variety of human disorders and fatal diseases. 
 
More on Epigenetics
 
The term epigenetics refers to heritable changes in gene expression.  Most studies focus on negative changes, such as those that cause disease, but there can be positive changes as well. 

Jewish culture, for example, by encouraging discussion, analysis, and exchange of opinions both socially and at religious seminaries, is thought to have contributed to a significant rise in the IQ of Jewish students.  That, combined with other characteristics such as sobriety, the value of study, and solid family and community bonds, may have influenced the high Jewish IQ as well.

These genetic changes were then inherited by new generations.  So that cultural environment may have been behind the extraordinary Jewish achievements in science, arts, and other fields of endeavor, particularly during the 20th century, when Jews were allowed to participate in academia and in other intellectual fields.

Read more

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Your grandparents' experiences
 leave a mark on your genes
 
Discover Magazine, May 2013 -  Your ancestors' lousy childhoods or excellent adventures might change your personality, bequeathing anxiety or resilience by altering the epigenetic expressions of genes in the brain.
 
For over a hundred years, those two views — nature or nurture, biology or psychology — offered opposing explanations for how behaviors develop and persist, not only within a single individual but across generations.
 
trait-1bGeneticists were especially surprised to find that epigenetic change could be passed down from parent to child, one generation after the next.

According to the new insights of behavioral epigenetics, traumatic experiences in our past, or in our recent ancestors’ past, leave molecular scars adhering to our DNA.
 
Jews whose great-grandparents were chased from their Russian shtetls; Chinese whose grandparents lived through the ravages of the Cultural Revolution; young immigrants from Africa whose parents survived massacres; adults of every ethnicity who grew up with alcoholic or abusive parents — all carry with them more than just memories. 
 
You might have inherited not just your grandmother’s knobby knees, but also her predisposition toward depression caused by the neglect she suffered as a newborn. 
 
Why can’t your friend “just get over” her upbringing by an angry, distant mother? Why can’t she “just snap out of it”? The reason may well be due to (changes to her brain genes in childhood), thereby handcuffing her mood to feelings of fear and despair.  (Translate that to Muslim rage and fanaticism and our failure to reason with those upholding those feelings. - blogger.)
 
Wealth and poverty also change people's genes, and those changes are inheritable.
 
Neuroscientist Eric Nestler of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York exposed male mice to 10 days of bullying by larger, more aggressive mice. At the end of the experiment, the bullied mice were socially withdrawn. 
 
To test whether such effects could be transmitted to the next generation, Nestler took another group of bullied mice and bred them with females, but kept them from ever meeting their offspring.  
 
Despite having no contact with their depressed fathers, the offspring grew up to be hypersensitive to stress. “It was not a subtle effect; the offspring were dramatically more susceptible to developing signs of depression,” he says.

 


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 Epigenetic studies have not addressed the case of Islamic anger and violence as an endemic and inherited trait, but here is another side of epigenetic inheritance:
Epigenetic Inheritance:  Memories pass between generations - or the effects of them.


Generations of a family



BBC - Behaviour can be affected by events in previous generations which have been passed on through a form of genetic memory, animal studies suggest.
 
Experiments showed that a traumatic event could affect the DNA in sperm and alter the brains and behaviour of subsequent generations.
 
A Nature Neuroscience study shows mice trained to avoid a smell passed their aversion on to their "grandchildren".
 
Experts said the results were important for phobia and anxiety research.
The animals were trained to fear a smell similar to cherry blossom.
The team at the Emory University School of Medicine, in the US, then looked at what was happening inside the sperm.
 
They showed a section of DNA responsible for sensitivity to the cherry blossom scent was made more active in the mice's sperm.
 
Both the mice's offspring, and their offspring, were "extremely sensitive" to cherry blossom and would avoid the scent, despite never having experienced it in their lives.
 
Changes in brain structure were also found.
 
"The experiences of a parent, even before conceiving, markedly influence both structure and function in the nervous system of subsequent generations," the report concluded.
 
Family affair
 
The findings provide evidence of "transgenerational epigenetic inheritance" - that the environment can affect an individual's genetics, which can in turn be passed on.
 
One of the researchers Dr Brian Dias told the BBC: "This might be one mechanism that descendants show imprints of their ancestor.
 
"There is absolutely no doubt that what happens to the sperm and egg will affect subsequent generations."
 
Prof Marcus Pembrey, from University College London, said the findings were "highly relevant to phobias, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorders" and provided "compelling evidence" that a form of memory could be passed between generations.
 
He commented: "It is high time public health researchers took human transgenerational responses seriously.
 
"I suspect we will not understand the rise in neuropsychiatric disorders or obesity, diabetes and metabolic disruptions generally without taking a multigenerational approach."
 
In the smell-aversion study, is it thought that either some of the odour ends up in the bloodstream which affected sperm production or that a signal from the brain was sent to the sperm to alter DNA.
 
Source
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 
WIDESPREAD CHILD ABUSE IN ISLAM


The prophet Mohammed married a nine-year old girl.  Marriage to children is common and an accepted practice in Islam.  Many of those girls die during childbirth because their bodies are not yet mature enough for pregnancy.  Others are so injured during their wedding night that they need medical emergency treatment.  

The practice of female genital mutilation has been brought by migrants into the West, and it is reported that there are 100 cases a week in Britain.  http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/07/21/more-than-100-new-cases-female-genital-mutilation-recorded-every-week/
 
  
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 
 
The case of Camelia Sadat
 
Child sexual abuse does not only happen in villages and among the uneducated population.  It's a well-established custom all over Islam.
 
Camelia Sadat, daughter of President Sadat of Egypt, the same president awarded a Nobel Peace Prize, tells of how he forced her at age 12 to marry one of his collaborators.  The marriage was abusive and violent.  Once she grew up she managed to divorce him. 
 
Read her story and watch video interview
 
 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 
Hundreds of children are sexually molested by Palestinians in Gaza every year
 
Note that there are no longer any Jews in Gaza, since Israel's withdrawal in 2005.  Arabs can't blame the "occupation" or the Jews, and Hamas is in full charge of the territory.
 
The Palestinian Center for Democracy and Conflict Resolution has issued a press release saying that some 700 children were sexually abused in each of the past two years in Gaza, and over a thousand were victims of similar crimes in 2013.    The abuse includes molestation and rape.
 
The victims tend to be male and were most often between the ages of 7 and 12.  The attacks happened in family homes, but also in schools and even in public places.
 
Out of these thousands of cases, only 27 of the attackers have been brought to justice, according to the center's director Said Makadmeh. He blamed existing customs and traditions which influenced the judges and parents' fears of scandal as the main reasons.

 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 
Bacha Bazi - The Dancing Boys of Afghanistan 2US COLONEL SAYS SOLDIERS SHOULD IGNORE AFGHAN SOLDIERS' RAPE OF LITTLE BOYS
- Decorated Green Beret CHARLES MARTLAND involuntarily dismissed by the US Army for striking an Afghan police who had kidnapped, chained, and raped a little boy
 - Raping little boys is a tradition in Afghanistan.
- Canadian soldiers' reports on this issue have been ignored by the military "for lack of evidence".
READ MORE
 
 
Western Complicity in the Rape of Little Boys in Afghanistan
 
The Dancing Boys of Afghanistan
 
 
 
Documentary on Vimeo - https://vimeo.com/11352212
 
Daily Mail - the secret shame of Afghanistan
 
 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


MUSLIM MIGRANTS' DEPRAVED BEHAVIOR AT GERMAN SWIMMING POOLS IS OUT OF CONTROL 
 - They defecate, grope girls and boys, rape, and masturbate in front of children 
- AUSTRIAN mother catches middle-aged migrant sexually assaulting her little boy at the pool

CSfGAkOXAAAC1BJ
READ MORE
http://ottersandsciencenews.blogspot.ca/2016/01/muslim-migrants-depraved-behavior-at.html


 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


 
Albert Einstein 
 INTELLIGENCE GENES REALLY EXIST
- Scientists discover genes that determine intelligence
 - There are plans to manipulate them
 - Nicholas Wade's book A TROUBLESOME INHERITANCE was pilloried for presenting links between genes, race and human development

READ MORE
http://ottersandsciencenews.blogspot.ca/2015/12/intelligence-genes-really-exist.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 
Scientists at Duke University in North Carolina have found that forming a habit alters the brain's circuitry, leading to lasting changes which make us crave food, or repeat behaviours. Stock imageSTUDY: BRAINS GET PERMANENTLY REWIRED BY HABITS, particularly bad ones
 - ALSO: The sciences of genetics and epigenetics show how ISLAM's inbreeding, indoctrination and traditional practices cause inheritable damage leading to violence, rape and cognitive deficiency 

READ MORE
http://ottersandsciencenews.blogspot.ca/2016/01/study-brains-get-permanently-rewired-by.html


 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



Omar Mateen, who attacked and killed dozens at a gay night club, may have been gay
- The tortuous sexual lives and minds of the followers of ISLAM
- Dr. Nicolai Sennels explains why Islam creates psychopaths
- GENETICS AND EPIGENETICS
- What 14 centuries of indoctrination and inbreeding have done to Muslims
 
READ MORE
http://ottersandsciencenews.blogspot.ca/2016/06/the-plot-thickens-omar-mateen-was-gay.html

 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 

 REPORTS


How Islam Creates Sociopaths
By Dr. Nicolai Sennels

Nicolai Sennels is psychologist, a popular lecturer about Muslim integration and gangs, and author of “Among Criminal Muslims. A Psychologist’s Experiences from Copenhagen Municipality” (Free Press Society, 2009)
 
Psychopathic people and behavior are found within all cultures and religions. But one tops them all — by many lengths:  Islam

The daily mass killings, terror, persecutions and family executions committed by the followers of Islam are nauseating, and the ingenuity behind the attacks — always looking for new and more effective ways of killing and terrorizing people — is astonishing:
-  hijacking jumbo jets and flying them into skyscrapers, hunting unarmed and innocent people with grenades and automatic rifles in shopping malls, planting bombs in one’s own body, using model airplanes as drones, attaching large rotating blades to pickup trucks and using them as human lawn movers,
-  killing family members with acid or fire, hanging people publicly from cranes in front of cheering crowds, etc.- in addition to stabbing people in the back, shooting parents in front of their children, slitting throats of sleeping babies, etc.

It makes one ask oneself: what creates such lack of empathy and almost playful and creative attitude towards murdering perceived enemies?
This is a question for psychologists like me.
Studying the Muslim mind
 
Nobody is born a mass murderer, a rapist or a violent criminal. So what is it in the Muslim culture that influences their children in a way that makes so relatively many Muslims harm other people

As a psychologist in a Danish youth prison, I had a unique chance to study the mentality of Muslims. 70 percent of youth offenders in Denmark have a Muslim background. I was able to compare them with non-Muslim clients from the same age group with more or less the same social background.
 
I came to the conclusion that Islam and Muslim culture have certain psychological mechanisms that harm people’s development and increase criminal behavior.
 
I am, of course, aware that Muslims are different, and not all Muslims follow the Quran’s violent and perverted message and their prophet’s equally embarrassing example. But as with all other religions, Islam also influences its followers and the culture they live in.
One could talk about two groups of psychological mechanisms that both singly and combined increase violent behavior.
One group is mainly connected with religion, which aims at indoctrinating Islamic values in children as early as possible and with whatever means necessary, including violence and intimidation.
One can understand a Muslim parent’s concern about his offspring’s religious choices, because the Sharia orders the death penalty for their children should they pick another religion than their parents.
The other group of mechanisms are more cultural and psychological. These cultural psychological mechanisms are a natural consequence of being influenced by a religion like Islam and stemming from a 1,400 year old tribal society with very limited freedom to develop beyond what the religion allows.
Classical Brainwashing Methods in the Upbringing
 
Brainwashing people into believing or doing things against their own human nature — such as hating or even killing innocents they do not even know — is traditionally done by combining two things: pain and repetition.
The conscious infliction of psychological and physical suffering breaks down the person’s resistance to the constantly repeated message.
Totalitarian regimes use this method to reform political dissidents. Armies in less civilized countries use it to create ruthless soldiers, and religious sects all over the world use it to fanaticize their followers.
During numerous sessions with more than a hundred Muslim clients, I found that violence and repetition of religious messages are prevalent in Muslim families. 
Muslim culture simply does not have the same degree of understanding of human development as in civilized societies, and physical pain and threats are therefore often the preferred tool to raise children.
This is why so many Muslim girls grow up to accept violence in their marriages, and why Muslim boys grow up to learn that violence is acceptable 
And it is the main reason why nine out of ten children removed from their parents by authorities in Copenhagen are from immigrant families.

The Muslim tradition of using pain and intimidation as part of disciplining children is also widely used in Muslim schools — also in the West.
Combined with countless repetitions of Quranic verses in Islamic schools and families, all this makes it very difficult for children to defend themselves against being indoctrinated to follow the Quran, even if it is against secular laws, logic, and the most basic understanding of compassion.
And as we know from so many psychological studies, whatever a child is strongly influenced by at that age takes an enormous personal effort to change later in life.

It is no wonder that Muslims in general, in spite of Islam’s inhumane nature and obvious inability to equip its followers with humor, compassion and other attractive qualities, are stronger in their faith than any other religious group.
Four Enabling Psychological Factors
 
Not only does a traditional Islamic upbringing resemble classical brainwashing methods, but also, the culture it generates cultivates four psychological characteristics that further enable and increase violent behavior.
These four mental factors are
  • anger
  • lack of self-confidence
  • no sense of responsibility for oneself
  • intolerance
When it comes to anger, Western societies widely agree that it is a sign of weakness. Uncontrolled explosions of this unpleasant feeling are maybe the fastest way of losing face, especially in Northern countries, and though angry people may be feared, they are never respected.
In Muslim culture, anger is much more accepted, and being able to intimidate people is seen as strength and source of social status.
We even see ethnic Muslim groups or countries proudly declare whole days of anger, and use expressions such as “holy anger” — a term that seems contradictory in peaceful cultures.
In Western societies, the ability to handle criticism constructively if it is justified, and with a shrug if it is misguided, is seen as an expression of self-confidence and authenticity.
As everyone has noticed, this is not the case among Muslims. Here criticism, no matter how true, is seen as an attack on one’s honor, and it is expected that the honor is restored by using whatever means necessary to silence the opponent.
Muslims almost never attempt to counter criticism with logical arguments; instead, they try to silence the criticism by pretending to be offended or by name-calling, or by threatening or even killing the messenger.
The third psychological factor concerns responsibility for oneself, and here the psychological phenomenon “locus of control” plays a major role.
People raised by Western standards generally have an inner locus of control, meaning that they experience their lives as governed by inner factors, such as one’s own choices, world view, ways of handling emotions and situations, etc.
Muslims are raised to experience their lives as being controlled from the outside.
Everything happens “insha’ Allah” — if Allah wills — and the many religious laws, traditions and powerful male authorities leave little room for individual responsibility.
This is the cause for the embarrassing and world-famous Muslim victim mentality, where everybody else is blamed and to be punished for the Muslims’ own self-created situation.
Finally, the fourth psychological factor making Muslims vulnerable to the violent message in the Quran concerns tolerance.
While Western societies in general define a good person as being open and tolerant, Muslims are told that they are superior to non-Muslims, destined to dominate non-Muslims, and that they must distance themselves socially and emotionally from non-Muslims.
The many hateful and dehumanizing verses in the Quran and the Hadiths against non-Muslims closely resemble the psychological propaganda that leaders use against their own people in order to prepare them mentally for fighting and killing the enemy.
Killing another person is easier if you hate him and do not perceive him as fully human.
Why Islam Creates Monsters
 
The cultural and psychological cocktail of anger, low self-esteem, victim mentality, a willingness to be blindly guided by outer authorities, and an aggressive and discriminatory view toward non-Muslims, forced upon Muslims through pain, intimidation and mind-numbing repetitions of the Quran’s almost countless verses promoting hate and violence against non-Muslims, is the reason why Islam creates monsters.
The Psychological Problem within Islam
 
The problem with Islam and Muslim culture is that there are so many psychological factors pushing its followers towards a violent attitude against non-Muslims that a general violent clash is — at least from a psychological perspective — inevitable.
With such strong pressure and such strong emotions within such a large group of people — all pitched against us — we are facing the perfect storm, and I see no possibilities of turning it around.

For people to change, they have to want it, to be allowed to change, and to be able to change — and only a tiny minority of Muslims have such lucky conditions.
Far too many people underestimate the power of psychology embedded in religion and culture. As we have already seen, no army of social workers, generous welfare states, sweet-talking politicians, politically correct journalists or democracy-promoting soldiers can stop these enormous forces.
Sensible laws on immigration and Islamization in our own countries can limit the amount of suffering, but based on my education and professional experience as a psychologist for Muslims, I estimate that we will not be able to deflect or avoid this many-sided, aggressive movement against our culture.
I do believe that we, as a democratic and educated society can become focused and organized concerning the preservation of our values and constitutions, can win this ongoing conflict started by the often inbred followers of Sharia.
The big question is how much of our dignity, our civil rights, and our blood, money and tears will we lose in the process.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



 Shocking Report? Muslims
Raised to be Insecure and Intolerant
  

By Leslie Sacks
 

The research and writings of Nicolai Sennels may have crucial - albeit exceptionally controversial and politically incorrect - implications for understanding both the likely similarities as well as possible crucial differences between many Muslims and Westerners as far as politics, economics and religion are concerned.
 
It is also important to include these postulations (even if clearly only imperfect generalizations) in any discussion as to how these cultural implications, where relevant, would affect the chances for a Muslim Reformation and the evolution of Islamic moderation.
 
Nicolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who developed an unorthodox therapy at Sønderbro, the Danish youth prison.

He taught the young prisoners about mindfulness meditation and developed a special program on anger management, focusing on teaching criminals with a low understanding of emotions and empathy, how to take responsibility for their own behavior. In 2008, the prisoners of Sønderbro voted the facility as the best prison in Denmark.
 
Seven out of ten inmates in the Danish youth prisons have immigrant backgrounds, and almost all of them are Muslims.

Sennels was threatened by his superiors that if he were to discuss his experiences, he would risk losing his job.
 
Sennels decided in spite of the evident risks, to publish a book on his experiences, Among Criminal Muslims: A Psychologist's Experiences from the Copenhagen Municipality. Hereafter are selections from his interviews, which may be one-sided, may be hard-hitting, yet do open the door somewhat to issues often ignored:
 
Sennels: There are many differences between people brought up as Muslims and those who are brought up as Westerners. I identified four main differences that are important in order to understand the behavior of Muslims. They concern anger, self-confidence, the so-called "locus of control" and identity.
 
Westerners are brought up to think of anger as a sign of weakness, powerlessness and lack of self-control. "Big dogs don't have to bark," as we say in Denmark. In Muslim culture, anger is seen as a sign of strength. To Muslims, being aggressive is a way of gaining respect. When we see pictures of bearded men hopping up and down and shooting in the air, we should take it for what it is: the local madhouse passing by.
 
In Western culture, self-confidence is connected with the ability to meet criticism calmly and to respond rationally. We are raised to see people who easily get angry when criticized, as insecure and immature.
 
In Muslim culture it is the opposite; it is honorable to respond aggressively and to engage in a physical fight in order to scare or force critics to withdraw, even if this results in a prison sentence or even death.
 
They see non-aggressive responses to such threats and violence as a sign of a vulnerability that is to be exploited.
 
They do not interpret a peaceful response as an invitation to enter into a dialogue, diplomacy, intellectual debate, compromise or peaceful coexistence.
 
"Locus of control" is a term used in psychology, and relates to the way in which people feel that their lives are controlled. In Western culture, we are brought up to have an "inner locus of control," meaning that we see our own inner emotions, reactions, decisions and views as the main deciding factor in our lives.
 
There may be outer circumstances that influence our situation, but in the end, it is our own perception of a situation and the way we handle it that decides our future and our state of mind.
 
The "inner locus of control" leads to increased self-responsibility and motivates people to become able to solve their own problems. Muslims are brought up to have an "outer locus of control."
 
Their constant use of the term inshallah ("Allah willing") when talking about the future, as well as the fact that most aspects of their lives are decided by outer traditions and authorities, leaves very little space for individual freedom.
 
Independent initiatives are often severely punished. This shapes their way of thinking, and means that when things go wrong, it is always the fault of others or the situation.
 
Unfortunately, many Westerners go overboard with their self-responsibility and start to take responsibility for others' behavior as well.
 
The mix of many Westerners being overly forgiving, their flexible attitude, and Muslim self-pity and blame is the psychological crowbar that has opened the West to Islamization (and consequent sympathy towards Shariah Law and Madrassas).
 
Our overly protective welfare system shields immigrants from noticing the consequences of their own behavior and thereby learning from their mistakes and motivating them to improve.
 
Finally, identity plays a big role when it comes to psychological differences between Muslims and Westerners. Westerners are taught to be open and tolerant toward other cultures, races, religions, etc.
 
This makes us less critical, impairs our ability to discriminate, and makes our societies open to the influence of other cultural trends and values that may not always be constructive. Muslims, on the other hand, are taught again and again that they are superior, and that all others are so bad that Allah will throw them in hell when they die.
 
While many Westerners find national and cultural pride embarrassing, Muslim culture's self-glorification achieves the opposite with their culture and identity.
In general, Westerners are taught to be kind, self-assured, self-responsible and tolerant, while Muslims are taught to be aggressive, insecure and intolerant.
 
Integration in the West is dependent on motivation and freedom. Immigrants have to want to integrate, be allowed to by their family and friends.
 
People coming from cultures that are aimed mainly at physical survival, and in which religious  practice and adherence to cultural traditions give more social status than having a good education and being self-supporting, usually are not very productive if they can live on the state.
 
If on top of that, they can live in closed communities among others with the same culture and language, there is very little reason for them to get involved in our society.
 
The only solution is to make the lack of integration so impractical and economically non-beneficial that the only attractive choice is to integrate or receive our offer of state-sponsored repatriation.
 
Through communal fear and coercion, the majority "voluntarily" prefer Sharia to integration.
 
Handling intellectually demanding jobs in our high-tech societies, it is not easy for people brought up to believe that the Qur'an and Hadith, not school and science, has the answers. Our workplaces demand that the employees are able to take initiative and be creative, difficult among people who are first of all expected to blindly submit and who live in surroundings that punish independent thinking and behavior, sometimes even with death.
 
Adams' and Maslow's views describe the goals and aims of the Western society as the full development of an individual's potential - this does not apply to Islam or the Muslim tradition.
 
The aim of Islam and Muslims is dominance, not self-realization. Islam and Muslim culture is an aggressive movement, and giving space to female qualities such as sensitivity and empathy would be a hindrance.
 
Diplomacy, compromise, tolerance, democracy, compassion, sensitivity and empathy have to be locked away both on an internal and external level. On the outside, the oppression of women limits their influence, and their aversion against femininity in the outer world helps Muslims to also repress it inside themselves on the psychological level.
 
Oppression of women is thus a psychological method of hardening a culture on the outside and people on the inside.
 
The other reason why Muslims oppress women and female sexuality is the fact that women are simply stronger when it comes to sex. And it does not work for omnipotent, jealous and insecure Muslim macho-men that they in the most naked and vulnerable situation of all are the weaker party. Muslim men compensate for this by oppressing their women and locking them up in apartments and ugly clumsy garments.
 
In many Muslim societies, a women's ability to enjoy sex is simply destroyed by clitorectomy via a knife or a piece of glass.
 
True love can only exist on the basis of respect and equality. The emotional and sexual frustration that results from the inequality of the sexes and being forced to marry a partner whom one does not love surely contributes to the aggression and emotional immaturity. As one said, "forced marriage is the earthquake and what follows is a tsunami of domestic abuse, sexual abuse, child protection issues, suicide and murder."
 
Muslim culture's degrading view of non-Muslims functions in the same way as war propaganda. By hearing again and again how evil, disgusting and unworthy the enemy is, empathy is removed, aggression is strengthened, and the step towards harming the perceived enemy becomes smaller.
 
Islam does not strive for freedom, happiness and love. Islam strives for the submission of Muslims to Allah and of non-Muslims to Muslims - a dark, cold and humorless world where men are forced to mistreat their women and everybody is a slave to a god whose only wish is the enforcement of Sharia down to the very last comma. They do what they can to reach their final solution, and we must do what we can to prevent it from happening.
 
We in Denmark are worried about the freedom of our women and the future of our children, and about our constitutions. And we know that the first and in many cases also the biggest victims of Islam are Muslims.
 
Our politicians and media aim for the soft middle in society in order to be reelected and to sell newspapers and ads, and it is therefore up to ordinary people to protect our values, society and constitution and not fear to lose a few politically correct friends on the way.
Source
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/shocking-report-muslims-raised-to-be-insecure-and-intolerant
 
 
 
 
 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 
Muslim Inbreeding:
Impacts on intelligence, sanity, health and society
 
By Dr. Nicolai Sennels
 
Massive inbreeding within the Muslim culture during the last 1.400 years may have done catastrophic damage to their gene pool. The consequences of intermarriage between first cousins often have serious impact on the offspring’s intelligence, sanity, health and on their surroundings
 
The most famous example of inbreeding is in ancient Egypt, where several Pharaonic dynasties collapsed after a couple of hundred years.
 
In order to keep wealth and power within the family, the Pharaohs often married their own sister or half-sister and after a handful of generations the offspring were mentally and physically unfit to rule.
 
Another historical example is the royal houses of Europe where royal families often married among each other because tradition did not allow them to marry people of non-royal class.
 
The high amount of mentally retarded and handicapped royalties throughout European history shows the unhealthy consequences of this practice. Luckily, the royal families have now allowed themselves to marry for love and not just for status.
 
The Muslim culture still practices inbreeding and has been doing so for longer than any Egyptian dynasty. This practice also predates the world’s oldest monarchy (the Danish) by 300 years. 

A rough estimate shows that close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred: In Pakistan, 70 percent of all marriages are between first cousins (so-called "consanguinity") and in Turkey the amount is between 25-30 percent (Jyllands-Posten, 27/2 2009 More stillbirths among immigrants"
 
Statistical research on Arabic countries shows that up to 34 percent of all marriages in Algiers are consanguine (blood related), 46 percent in Bahrain, 33 percent in Egypt, 80 percent in Nubia (southern area in Egypt), 60 percent in Iraq, 64 percent in Jordan, 64 percent in Kuwait, 42 percent in Lebanon, 48 percent in Libya, 47 percent in Mauritania, 54 percent in Qatar, 67 percent in Saudi Arabia, 63 percent in Sudan, 40 percent in Syria, 39 percent in Tunisia, 54 percent in the United Arabic Emirates and 45 percent in Yemen (Reproductive Health Journal, 2009 Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs.).
 
A large part of inbred Muslims are born from parents who are themselves inbred - which increase the risks of negative mental and physical consequenses greatly.
 
The amount of blood related marriages is lower among Muslim immigrants living in the West.
 
Among Pakistanis living in Denmark the amount is down to 40 percent and 15 percent among Turkish immigrants (Jyllands-Posten, 27/2 2009 More stillbirths among immigrants".).
 
More than half of Pakistani immigrants living in Britain are intermarried:
The research, conducted by the BBC and broadcast to a shocked nation on Tuesday, found that at least 55% of the community was married to a first cousin. This is thought to be linked to the probability that a British Pakistani family is at least 13 times more likely than the general population to have children with recessive genetic disorders.” (Times of India, 17/11 2005 Ban UK Pakistanis from marrying cousins).
 
The lower percentages might be because it is difficult to get the chosen family member to the country, or because health education is better in the West.
 
Low intelligence
 
Several studies show that children of consanguineous marriages have lower intelligence than children of non-related parents. Research shows that the IQ is 10-16 points lower in children born from related parents and that abilities related to social behavior develops slower in inbred babies:
 
"Effects of parental consanguinity on the cognitive and social behavior of children have been studied among the Ansari Muslims of Bhalgapur, Bihar.
 
IQ in inbred children (8-12 years old) is found to be lower (69 in rural and 79 in suburban populations) than that of the outbred ones (79 and 95 respectively). The onset of various social profiles like visual fixation, social smile, sound seizures, oral expression and hand-grasping are significantly delayed among the new-born inbred babies." (Indian National Science Academy, 1983 Consanguinity Effects on Intelligence Quotient and Neonatal Behaviours of nsari Muslim Children").
 
The article "Effects of inbreeding on Raven Matrices" concludes that "Indian Muslim school boys, ages 13 to 15 years, whose parents are first cousins, were compared with classmates whose parents are genetically unrelated on the Raven Standard Progressive Matrices, a nonverbal test of intelligence.
 
The inbred group scored significantly lower and had significantly greater variance than the non-inbred group, both on raw scores and on scores statistically adjusted to control for age and socioeconomic status." (Behaviour Genetics, 1984).
 
 
Another study shows that the risk of having an IQ lower than 70 goes up 400 percent from 1.2 percent in children from normal parents to 6.2 percent in inbred children: "The data indicate that the risk for mental retardation in matings of normal parents increases from 0.012 with random matings to 0.062 for first-cousin parentage." (Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 1978 Effect of inbreeding on IQ and mental retardation").
 
The study A study of possible deleterious effects of consanguinity concludes, that "The occurrence of malignancies, congenital abnormalities, mental retardation and physical handicap was significantly higher in offspring of consanguineous than non-consanguineous marriages."
 
Mental and physical diseases and death
 
The risk of stillbirth doubles when parents are first cousins (Jyllands-Posten, 27/2 2009 More stillbirths among immigrants). One study analyzed the risk of perinatal death (the child dies during its own birth), infant death (child dies while still infant) and autosomal recessive disorders (serious and often deadly genetic diseases such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy):
Perinatal mortality in the Pakistani children was 1.5 times higher than that in the Norwegian children, and infant mortality in the Pakistani children was more than double that in the Norwegian children. Deaths due to autosomal recessive disorders were 18 times more common in the Pakistani children. Similarly, deaths due to multiple malformations, which may be part of unrecognized autosomal recessive syndromes, were 10 times more common.

There are also evidence suggesting that inbred people has a higher risk of developing mental disorders: "The clinical observations indicated that depression is very high in some communities where the consanguinity of marriages is also high." (Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 2009 "Relationship between consanguinity and depression in a south Indian population".
 
Another study focused on the relationship between intermarriage and schizophrenia: "The closer the blood relative, the more likely was there to be a schizophrenic illness." (American Psychiatric Press, 1982 The role of genetic factors  in the ethiology of the schizophrenic disorders.
 
The increased risk of insanity among children of marriages between cousins might explain why immigrant patients are stressing the psychiatric system and are strongly overrepresented among insane criminals: "In Sct. Hans Hospital, which has the biggest ward for clinically insane criminals in Denmark, more than 40 percent of the patients have an immigrant background." (Kristeligt Dagblad, 26/6 2007 Ethnic minorities overrepresented among the criminal insane).
 
Implications for the Western and the Muslim World
 
The consequences for offspring of consanguineous marriages are unpleasantly clear: Death, low intelligence or even mental retardation, handicaps and diseases often leading to a slow and painful death. Other consequences are:
 
Limited social skills and understanding, limited ability to manage education and work procedures and painful treatment procedures. The negative cognitive consequences also influence the executive functions. The impairment of concentration and emotional control most often leads to anti-social behavior.
 
The economic costs and consequences for society of inbreeding are of course secondary to the reality of human suffering.
 
However, inbreeding among Muslims has severe implications for both the Western societies and the Muslim world.
 
Expenses related to mentally and physically handicapped Muslim immigrants drains the budget for other public services: "When cousins have children together, they are twice as likely to have a disabled child - it costs municipal funds dearly.
 
Disabled immigrant children costs Danish municipalities millions. In Copenhagen County alone, the number of disabled children in the overall increase of 100 percent at 10 years. ... Meredith Lefelt has contacted 330 families with disabled children in Copenhagen. She estimates that one third of their clients have a foreign cultural background." (BT, 10/11 2003 Immigrants inbreeding costing one million.
 
On top come the expenses for Muslim immigrants who - because of different consequences of being born from blood related parents - are not able to live up to the challenges of our Western work market: Muslim immigrants and their descendants in Europe have a very high rate of unemployment.
 
The same goes for Muslims in USA, where the Gallup Institute made a study involving 300.000 people concluding “The majority of Muslims in USA have a lower income, are less educated and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.” (Berlingske Tidende, d. 3. marts 2009: Muslims thrive in USA.
 
The cognitive consequences of Muslim inbreeding might explain why non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the Danish army's intelligence test than native Danes: "19.3% of non-Western immigrants are not able to pass the Danish army's intelligence test. In comparison, only 4.7% of applicants with Danish background do not pass." (TV 2 Nyhederne, 13/6 2007 Immigrants flunk army test.
 
It probably also explains - at least partly - why two thirds of all immigrant school children with Arabic backgrounds are illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system: "Those who speak Arabic with their parents have an extreme tendency to lack reading abilities - 64 percent are illiterate. ... No matter if it concerns reading abilities, mathematics or science, the pattern is the same: The bilingual (largely Muslim) immigrants' skills are exceedingly poor compared to their Danish classmates." (Rockwool Foundation Research Unit, May 2007: Ethnic students does not make Danish children worse.
 
The high expenses on special education for slow learners consumes one third of the budget for the Danish schools. “Immigrant children are clearly overrepresented on Copenhagen’s schools for retarded children and children with physical handicaps. … 51 percent of the children on the three schools in Copenhagen for children with physical and mental handicaps har immigrant back ground and on one of the schools the amount is 70 percent. …
 
"These amounts are significantly higher than the share of immigrant children in the municipality, which is 33 percent. The many handicapped children are a clear evidence that there are many intermarried parents in the immigrant families.” (Jydske Vestkysten, 4/4 2009 Tosprogede i overtal på handicapskoler).
 
Our high level of education may also make it harder for inbred students to follow and finish their studies: "Young people with minority backgrounds have a significantly higher dropout rate at secondary schools than youth with a Danish background. For trade school education, the dropout rate among immigrants is 60 percent, twice as high among adolescents with a Danish background....
 
There is great variation in educational outcomes when compared with national origin. For example, dropout among young people with Lebanese or Iranian background is far greater than among people of Vietnamese background." (Center for Knowledge on Integration in Randers, May 2005 “Youth, education and integration“). ”Among immigrant children that are born and raised in Denmark, more than a third has no education. Among native Danes it is less than one fifth that do not get an education. (Statistics Denmark: “Indvandrere i 2007”.
 
The negative consequences of inbreeding are also vast for the Muslim world. Inbreeding may thus explain why only nine Muslims ever managed to receive the prestigious Nobel Prize (5 of them won the "Peace Prize" - for peace that turned out not to last for very long).
 
The limited ability to understand, appreciate and produce knowledge following a limited IQ is probably also partly the reason why Muslim countries produce 1/10 of the World average when it comes to scientific research: "In 2003, the world average for production of articles per million inhabitants was 137, whereas none of the 47 OIC countries for which there were data achieved production above 107 per million inhabitants. The OIC average was just 13." (Nature 444, p. 26-27, 1. November 2006 ”Islam and science: The data gap”.
 
The lack of interest in science and human development in the Muslim World is also clear in the UN Arab Human Development Reports (AHDR). AHDR concludes that there have been fewer books translated into Arabic in the last thousand years than the amount of books translated within the country of Spain every year:
 
"The Arab world translates about 330 books annually, one fifth of the number that Greece translates. The cumulative total of translated books since the Caliph Maa'moun's [sic] time (the ninth century) is about 100,000, almost the average that Spain translates in one year." (Eugene Rogan ”Arab Books and human development”. Index of Censorship, vol. 33, issue 2 April 2004, p. 152-157). "70 percent of the Turkish citizens never read books."(APA, 23 February 2009 “).
 
 
 
Conclusion
 
There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims. Because Muslims’ religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. The overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences have been explained above.
 
Compassion for the health of future generations should be enough to ban intermarriage among first cousins. The economic and societal consequences do also count. Such a ban would also lessen Muslim immigration to the West because many Muslim families would like to be able to continue their practice of intermarriage in order to live up to cultural and religious traditions and keep wealth and power inside their family.
 
A legislative ban on first cousin marriages is a logical and compassionate imperative for both the Muslim world, for EU and our Western national governments.
 
Other articles by Nicolai Sennels:
  • Interview to the Finnish Hommaforum, December 17th 2009: An interview with Nicolai Sennels
  • Gates of Vienna, April 11th 2010: The Stigmatization Fallacy
  • Article in New English Review, May 2010: Muslims and Westerners: The psychological differences
  • Review on Gates of Vienna, May 8th 2010: Islam Means Never Having to say you’re sorry
  • Interview in FrontPage Magazine, May 5th 2010: Among Criminal Muslims
  • Conference on FrontPageMagazine, June 21st 2010: A psychiatric Conference on Truthful Girl
  • Article on Europenews.dk, 5. februar 2010: Sexual abuse widespread among Muslims
  • 180Grader, europenews.dk, GatesofVienna etc., July 28th 2010: Open letter to David Cameron regarding Turkey

  • Nicolai Sennels is a psychologist and author of “Among Criminal Muslims. A Psychologist’s Experiences from Copenhagen Municipality.”
     
    Source
     
     

     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


      
     Why Islam creates rapists and killers
     
     
    By psychologist Nicolas Sennels
     
    Psychopathic people and behaviour are found within all cultures and religions. But one tops them all — by many lengths.
     
    The daily mass killings, terror, persecutions and family executions committed by the followers of Islam are nauseating, and the ingenuity behind the attacks — always looking for new and more effective ways of killing and terrorising people — is astonishing: hijacking jumbo jets and flying them into skyscrapers, hunting unarmed and innocent people with grenades and automatic rifles in shopping malls, planting bombs in one’s own body, using model airplanes as drones, attaching large rotating blades to pickup trucks and using them as human lawn movers, killing family members with acid or fire, hanging people publicly from cranes in front of cheering crowds, etc. It makes one ask oneself: what creates such lack of empathy and almost playful and creative attitude towards murdering perceived enemies?
     
    This is a question for psychologists like me.
     
    Studying the Muslim mind
     
    Nobody is born a mass murderer, a rapist or a violent criminal. So what is it in the Muslim culture that influence their children in a way that make so relatively many Muslims harm other people?
     
     
    Palestinian calling for more stabbing of Jews in Israel
     
    As a psychologist in a Danish youth prison, I had a unique chance to study the mentality of Muslims. 70 percent of youth offenders in Denmark have a Muslim background. I was able to compare them with non-Muslim clients from the same age group with more or less the same social background.
     
    I came to the conclusion that Islam and Muslim culture have certain psychological mechanisms that harm people’s development and increase criminal behaviour.
     
    I am, of course, aware that Muslims are different, and not all Muslims follow the Quran’s violent and perverted message and their prophet’s equally embarrassing example. But as with all other religions, Islam also influences its followers and the culture they live in.
     
    One could talk about two groups of psychological mechanisms, that both singly and combined increase violent behaviour. One group is mainly connected with religion, which aims at indoctrinating Islamic values in children as early as possible and with whatever means necessary, including violence and intimidation.
     
    One can understand a Muslim parent’s concern about his offspring’s religious choices, because the sharia orders the death penalty for their children, should they pick another religion than their parents. The other group of mechanisms are more cultural and psychological. These cultural psychological mechanisms are a natural consequence of being influenced by a religion like Islam and stemming from a 1,400 year old tribal society with very limited freedom to develop beyond what the religion allows.
     
     
     
    Classical brainwashing methods in the upbringing
     
    Brainwashing people into believing or doing things against their own human nature — such as hating or even killing innocents they do not even know — is traditionally done by combining two things: pain and repetition. The conscious infliction of psychological and physical suffering breaks down the person’s resistance to the constantly repeated message.  
     
    Totalitarian regimes use this method to reform political dissidents. Armies in less civilized countries use it to create ruthless soldiers, and religious sects all over the world use it to fanaticize their followers.
     
    During numerous sessions with more than a hundred Muslim clients, I found that violence and repetition of religious messages are prevalent in Muslim families.
     
    Muslim culture simply does not have the same degree of understanding of human development as in civilized societies, and physical pain and threats are therefore often the preferred tool to raise children.
     
    This is why so many Muslim girls grow up to accept violence in their marriage, and why Muslim boys grow up to learn that violence is acceptable. And it is the main reason why nine out of ten children removed from their parents by authorities in Copenhagen are from immigrant families. The Muslim tradition of using pain and intimidation as part of disciplining children are also widely used in Muslim schools — also in the West.
     
    Combined with countless repetitions of Quranic verses in Islamic schools and families, all this makes it very difficult for children to defend themselves against being indoctrinated to follow the Quran, even if it is against secular laws, logic, and the most basic understanding of compassion.
     
    And as we know from so many psychological studies, whatever a child is strongly influenced by at that age takes an enormous personal effort to change later in life. It is no wonder that Muslims in general, in spite of Islam’s inhumane nature and obvious inability to equip its followers with humor, compassion and other attractive qualities, are stronger in their faith than any other religious group.
     
    Four enabling psychological factors
     
    Not only does a traditional Islamic upbringing resemble classical brainwashing methods, but also, the culture it generates cultivates four psychological characteristics that further enable and increase violent behaviour.
     
    These four mental factors are anger, self-confidence, responsibility for oneself and intolerance.
     
    When it comes to anger, Western societies widely agree that it is a sign of weakness. Uncontrolled explosions of this unpleasant feeling are maybe the fastest way of losing face, especially in Northern countries, and though angry people may be feared, they are never respected. In Muslim culture, anger is much more accepted, and being able to intimidate people is seen as strength and source of social status.
     
    We even see ethnic Muslim groups or countries proudly declare whole days of anger, and use expressions such as “holy anger” — a term that seems contradictory in peaceful cultures.
     
    In Western societies, the ability to handle criticism constructively if it is justified, and with a shrug if it is misguided, is seen as an expression of self-confidence and authenticity.
     
    As everyone has noticed, this is not the case among Muslims. Here criticism, no matter how true, is seen as an attack on one’s honor, and it is expected that the honor is restored by using whatever means necessary to silence the opponent. Muslims almost never attempt to counter criticism with logical arguments; instead, they try to silence the criticism by pretending to be offended or by name-calling, or by threatening or even killing the messenger.
     
    The third psychological factor concerns responsibility for oneself, and here the psychological phenomenon “locus of control” plays a major role. People raised by Western standards generally have an inner locus of control, meaning that they experience their lives as governed by inner factors, such as one’s own choices, world view, ways of handling emotions and situations, etc.
     
    Muslims are raised to experience their lives as being controlled from the outside. Everything happens “insha’ Allah” — if Allah wills — and the many religious laws, traditions and powerful male authorities leave little room for individual responsibility. This is the cause for the embarrassing and world-famous Muslim victim mentality, where everybody else is blamed and to be punished for the Muslims’ own self-created situation.
     
    Finally, the fourth psychological factor making Muslims vulnerable to the violent message in the Quran concerns tolerance. While Western societies in general define a good person as being open and tolerant, Muslims are told that they are superior to non-Muslims, destined to dominate non-Muslims, and that they must distance themselves socially and emotionally from non-Muslims.
     
    The many hateful and dehumanising verses in the Quran and the Hadiths against non-Muslims closely resemble the psychological propaganda that leaders use against their own people in order to prepare them mentally for fighting and killing the enemy. Killing another person is easier if you hate him and do not perceive him as fully human.
     
    Why Islam creates monsters
     
    The cultural and psychological cocktail of anger, low self-esteem, victim mentality, a willingness to be blindly guided by outer authorities, and an aggressive and discriminatory view toward non-Muslims, forced upon Muslims through pain, intimidation and mind-numbing repetitions of the Quran’s almost countless verses promoting hate and violence against non-Muslims, is the reason why Islam creates monsters.
     
    The psychological problem within Islam
     
    The problem with Islam and Muslim culture is that there are so many psychological factors pushing its followers towards a violent attitude against non-Muslims that a general violent clash is — at least from a psychological perspective — inevitable.
     
    With such strong pressure and such strong emotions within such a large group of people — all pitched against us — we are facing the perfect storm, and I see no possibilities of turning it around. For people to change, they have to want it, to be allowed to change, and to be able to change — and only a tiny minority of Muslims have such lucky conditions.
     
    Far too many people underestimate the power of psychology embedded in religion and culture. As we have already seen, no army of social workers, generous welfare states, sweet-talking politicians, politically correct journalists or democracy-promoting soldiers can stop these enormous forces.
     
    Sensible laws on immigration and Islamisation in our own countries can limit the amount of suffering, but based on my education and professional experience as a psychologist for Muslims, I estimate that we will not be able to deflect or avoid this many-sided, aggressive movement against our culture.
     
    I do believe that we, as a democratic and educated society can become focused and organised concerning the preservation of our values and constitutions, can win this ongoing conflict started by the often inbred followers of sharia. The big question is how much of our dignity, our civil rights, and our blood, money and tears will we lose in the process.

    Source
    http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/09/nicolai-sennels-psychology-why-islam-creates-monsters
     
     
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     
     
     
    DOES ISLAM ALLOW RAPE?
     
     
    It is against Islam to rape Muslim women, but Muhammad actually encouraged the rape of others captured in battle. This hadith provides the context for the Qur’anic verse (4:24):
    The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain.  They met their enemy and fought with them.  They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers.  So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Sura 4:24) "And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess." (Abu Dawud 2150, also Muslim 3433)
    Actually, as the hadith indicates, it wasn't Muhammad, but "Allah the Exalted" who told the men to rape the women in front of their husbands - which is all the more reason to think of Islam differently from other religions.

    Note also that the husbands of these unfortunate victims were obviously alive after battle.  This is important because it flatly contradicts those apologists who like to argue that the women Muhammad enslaved were widowed and thus unable to fend for themselves.  (Even if the apologists were right, what sort of a moral code is it that forces a widow to choose between being raped and starving?)

    There are several other episodes in which Muhammad is offered the clear opportunity to disavow raping women - yet he instead offers advice on how to proceed.  In one case, his men were reluctant to devalue their new slaves for later resale by getting them pregnant.  Muhammad was asked about coitus interruptus in particular:
    "O Allah's Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?"  The Prophet said, "Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.” (Bukhari 34:432)
    As indicated, the prophet of Islam did not mind his men raping the women, provided they ejaculated within the bodies of their victims.

    As one might imagine, Muhammad's obvious approval of raping women captured in battle and his own personal participation as recorded in many places is of intense inconvenience to the Muslim apologists of our time.  For this reason, some of them attempt to explain away these many episodes and Qur'anic references to sex with captives by pretending that these are cases in which women have fled bad marriages and sought refuge with the Muslims.  Some apologists even refer to them as "wives," even though the Qur'an makes a clear distinction between "those whom thy right hand possesses" and true wives (see Sura
    33:50).

    Beyond the desperation of the 21st century apologist however, there is absolutely nothing in the historical text that supports this rosy revision of Muslim history.  The women of the Banu Mustaliq were sold into slavery following their rape:
    "We went out with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi'l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing 'azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah's Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter" (Sahih Muslim 3371)
    In fact, female slaves were traded like any other simple commodity by Muhammad and his band of devoted followers:
    "Then the apostle sent Sa-d b. Zayd al-Ansari, brother of Abdu'l-Ashal with some of the captive women of Banu Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and weapons." (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham/Hisham 693)
    Is it Islamic to sell one's wife for horses?  Clearly these were not wives!

    More importantly, by definition a "captured" woman is not one who is fleeing her husband.  She is fleeing her captor (ie. the Muslim slave raider).  This hadith describes a typical raid, in which the women and children are captured as they are attempting to flee the attacking Muslims:
    “…and then we attacked from all sides and reached their watering-place where a battle was fought.  Some of the enemies were killed and some were taken prisoners.  I saw a group of persons that consisted of women and children [escaping in the distance].  I was afraid lest they should reach the mountain before me, so I shot an arrow between them and the mountain.  When they saw the arrow, they stopped.  So I brought them, driving them along” (Sahih Muslim 4345)
    The Muslim narrator sees the women trying to escape (following the massacre of their men) and cuts off their route by shooting an arrow into their path.  These aren't women trying to seek refuge with the Muslims.  They are trying to avoid capture by the Muslims.

    The same hadith goes on to recount that Muhammad personally demanded one of the captured women for his own use:
    I drove them along until I brought them to Abu Bakr who bestowed that girl upon me as a prize.  So we arrived in Medina.  I had not yet disrobed her when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) met me in the street and said: “Give me that girl.” (Sahih Muslim 4345)
    The prophet of Islam and his companions used war to collect women for personal sexual use and for trading.  Unless she was arbitrarily declared as someone's wife, the woman became a sex slave.  In no case was her fate tied to anything that she had personally done, nor was she given a choice about her future. 
    Source
     
     
     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
     
     
     
     
      ISLAMIC GENOCIDE THROUGH 14 CENTURIES OF CONQUEST AND CONFLICT
     
    Tears of Jihad
    By Dr. Bill Warner
     
     
     
    These figures are a rough estimate of the death of non-Muslims by the political act of jihad.
     
     
    Africa
    Thomas Sowell [Thomas Sowell, Race and Culture, BasicBooks, 1994, p. 188] estimates that 11 million slaves were shipped across the Atlantic and 14 million were sent to the Islamic nations of North Africa and the Middle East. For every slave captured many others died.
     
    Estimates of this collateral damage vary. The renowned missionary David Livingstone estimated that for every slave who reached a plantation, five others were killed in the initial raid or died of illness and privation on the forced march.[Woman’s Presbyterian Board of Missions, David Livingstone, p. 62, 1888]
     
    Those who were left behind were the very young, the weak, the sick and the old. These soon died since the main providers had been killed or enslaved. So, for 25 million slaves delivered to the market, we have an estimated death of about 120 million people. Islam ran the wholesale slave trade in Africa.
    120 million Africans
     
    Christians
    The number of Christians martyred by Islam is 9 million [David B. Barrett, Todd M. Johnson, World Christian Trends AD 30-AD 2200, William Carey Library, 2001, p. 230, table 4-10] . A rough estimate by Raphael Moore in History of Asia Minor is that another 50 million died in wars by jihad. So counting the million African Christians killed in the 20th century we have:
    60 million Christians
     
    Hindus
    Koenard Elst in Negationism in India gives an estimate of 80 million Hindus killed in the total jihad against India. [Koenard Elst, Negationism in India, Voice of India, New Delhi, 2002, pg. 34.] The country of India today is only half the size of ancient India, due to jihad. The mountains near India are called the Hindu Kush, meaning the “funeral pyre of the Hindus.”
    80 million Hindus
     
     
    Buddhists

     Buddhists do not keep up with the history of war. Keep in mind that in jihad only Christians and Jews were allowed to survive as dhimmis (servants to Islam) everyone else had to convert or die. Jihad killed the Buddhists in Turkey, Afghanistan, along the Silk Route, and in India. The total is roughly 10 million. [David B. Barrett, Todd M. Johnson, World Christian Trends AD 30-AD 2200, William Carey Library, 2001, p. 230, table 4-1.] 10 million Buddhists
     
     
    Jews
    Oddly enough there were not enough Jews killed in jihad to significantly affect the totals of the Great Annihilation. The jihad in Arabia was 100 percent effective, but the numbers were in the thousands, not millions. After that, the Jews submitted and became the dhimmis (servants and second class citizens) of Islam and did not have geographic political power.
     
    This gives a rough estimate of 270 million killed by jihad.

    Source
    https://www.politicalislam.com/tears-of-jihad/
     
     


     

    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    Thank you for visiting my blog. Your comments are always appreciated, but please do not include links.